Agenda, decisions and draft minutes

To take any questions or statements from members of the Public.

No questions or statements were received from members of the public.

Members are asked to declare the existence and nature of any Disclosable Pecuniary Interests in respect of any items of business to be considered at this meeting.

Public Space Protection Order - Proposals to Expand Existing.

In the interest of transparency, Councillor Shanice Goldman declared that she was currently subject to a complaint to the Council, lodged against her by the Police. She stated that the matter had not predetermined her in any way and that she maintained an open mind.

The Sub-Committee is asked to confirm as a true record the Minutes of the Meeting of the Sub-Committee held on 17 January 2024 (attached) and to authorise the Chair to sign them.

The Committee confirmed the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 17 January 2024 as a true record and authorised the Chair to sign them.

With respect to Agenda Item 3 – Minutes of the Previous Meeting – the Committee noted a typing error on page 3 of the agenda pack and sought clarification on the matter. The error was as follows:

The Sub-Committee is asked to confirm as a true record the Minutes of the Meeting of the Sub-Committee held on 17 January 2024…

The Chair confirmed that the Crime & Disorder Committee was indeed a Committee and not a Sub-Committee.

Following this clarification, the Committee confirmed the minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 17 January 2024 as a true record and authorised the Chair to sign them.

To determine the policy around the future of the legacy alcohol related Public Space Protection Order.

Following consideration, the Committee unanimously resolved to:

(1)        Authorise the Head of Housing and Community to carry out a public consultation on behalf of the Council on the basis of the proposed Public Spaces Protection Order outlined in appendix 1 of the report and for results of this consultation to be considered at the next meeting of the Crime and Disorder Committee.

The Committee received a report to determine the policy around the future of the legacy alcohol related Public Space Protection Order (‘PSPO’).

The Committee considered the following matters:

a)            Proposed Prohibitions. In response to a query from a Member, the Public Protection Manager explained that the drafting of the prohibitions set out at section 5 of the proposed PSPO at Appendix 1 had in large part been informed by similar PSPOs elsewhere in the county.

b)            Focus of the Legacy PSPO. Following a question from a Member, the Borough Commander explained that the legacy PSPO, upon which the currently proposed PSPO was seeking to expand, focussed solely on anti-social behaviour (‘ASB’) with respect to the consumption of alcohol in public locations.

c)            Error in the Report. The Committee noted an error in the report at paragraph 7.2. The Public Protection Manager explained that the bullet points provided at paragraph 7.2 actually belonged at paragraph 7.1.

d)            Duration of PSPOs. In response to a query from a Member, the Public Protection Manager explained that PSPOs, in law, can last for a maximum of three years.

e)            Intention of Proposed PSPO. Following a question from a Member, the Borough Commander confirmed that a number of the proposed PSPO prohibitions were already considered to be offences under law, such as under the Public Order Act. She explained that the intention behind the PSPO was to enable a low-level intervention option to prevent cases of ASB escalating towards arrests being made.

f)             Police Discretion. A Member enquired about how Police Officers determine when cases of ASB warrant low-level intervention versus a need to make an arrest. The Borough Commander stated that Police Officers are trained in appropriate use of enforcement and exercise discretion on a daily basis. She stated that every case of ASB is assessed individually to determine an appropriate response - she explained that in cases where a low-level intervention approach is not appropriate or does not work, escalation to an arrest may become necessary.

g)            Epsom Square. In response to comments from a Member, the Borough Commander stated that enforcement data highlighted that Epsom Square was a hotspot for ASB. She stated that, through collaboration with agencies and partnerships, work was ongoing to reduce and prevent ASB in that area. She explained that Epsom Square was included within Operation Chariot – a Home Office funded initiative to increase Police patrols and presence in the area.

h)            Reporting of Incidents. The Borough Commander stated that initiatives such as Operation Chariot are instigated, and made effective, by ASB data. She highlighted the importance of incidents of ASB being reported in order to gather data and to provide a clear picture of where ASB is prevalent and the types of ASB being perpetrated.

i)             CCTV. In response to a query from a Member, the Borough Commander confirmed that areas of Epsom & Ewell Borough have 24hr CCTV coverage and that the CCTV footage is monitored by trained operators following incidents and as part of ongoing  ...  view the full minutes text for item 4.